Inheritance Tax has many sides; the good, the bad and the downright… confusing. The ugly truth, however, is that all the money, assets, and other property in your estate will be assessed for Inheritance Tax (IHT) when you pass away. Even in your lifetime, certain gifts and transfers can be ‘clawed back’ to count as part of your estate for IHT.
You might wonder what the good bits of IHT can possibly be. Well, depending on your circumstances and the reliefs that you can apply, you might not have to pay any IHT at all. For a general overview of IHT, read our article on the basics.
In this post, we’re going to focus on two of these positives: Business Property Relief (BPR) and Agricultural Property Relief (APR). Whilst it may take a bit of Clint Eastwood-style squinting to size them both up, they are worth knowing about. They have the potential to exempt up to 100% of an asset from IHT. The reliefs can apply to lifetime transfers and to your estate when you pass away.
…And the livery?
A recently reported tax case concerned a livery business and whether BPR or APR could be applied to it. The case provides a good illustration of how these reliefs can operate and just how significant their IHT benefits can be. But before delving into the case, let’s look at the reliefs themselves.
Business Property Relief
There are two tiers of BPR. Some assets will be eligible for 100% relief (meaning that none of the value of the asset will be added in to your IHT calculation) and some are eligible for 50% (meaning half of the value will be ignored for IHT purposes).
In general, 100% relief can be claimed on:
- A business or interest in a business you own;
- Any shares you own in a company which is not listed on any stock exchange.
50% relief can be claimed on:
- Any shares you own in a company which is listed on a stock exchange, where those shares give you control of the voting rights in the company;
- Any land, building, or machinery you own which was used in a business you controlled (or in which you were a partner);
- Any land, building, or machinery used in the business which was held in a trust you were entitled to benefit from.
What will qualify for BPR?
Aside from the criteria above, there are other requirements to be met:
- You must have owned the business or asset in question for at least 2 years prior to your death (or, for lifetime transfers, when it was transferred);
- If it is an asset (rather than a business or shares etc.) it must have been used wholly or mainly for business purposes;
- If it is an asset, it must be needed for future use in the business.
However, even if the above requirements are met, some businesses (and any assets associated with them) are excepted from BPR. You cannot claim BPR if your business:
- Deals mainly with:
- stocks or shares
- land or buildings
- making or holding investments
- Is a not-for-profit organisation;
- Is being sold. Although, if your estate will be paid mainly with shares in the purchasing company, BPR might still be applied;
- Is being wound up. However, BPR may still be claimed if this is just part of a process to allow the business to continue.
Any business, interest, or asset which meets the BPR requirements is referred to as ‘relevant business property’.
Agricultural Property Relief
This is a much more specialised form of IHT relief. However, if you are a farmer, APR could be crucial. The difference between a high IHT bill and a low one could also mean the difference between selling off parts of a farm to pay the tax and keeping the farm intact when you pass it on.
APR also allows up to 100% of the value of the asset to be disregarded for IHT. There are several conditions which determine whether a qualifying asset will attract the 100% relief or the 50% relief instead. These are more technical than BPR and it is recommended that you discuss your circumstances fully with a specialist tax or legal advisor.
Property which qualifies for APR includes:
- Land, pasture, or woodland used for growing crops or intensively rearing animals or fish;
- Cottages, farmhouses and farm buildings;
- Stud farms for breeding, rearing and grazing horses;
- Land not currently being farmed under certain ‘habitat schemes’ or crop rotation schemes;
- Some agricultural shares and securities.
However, APR cannot be applied to:
- Farm equipment and machinery;
- Derelict buildings;
- Harvested crops;
- Property which is in the process of being sold.
For these assets, it is worth considering whether BPR can apply instead.
Like BPR, APR requires you to have owned the asset in question for at least two years prior to your death (or before the time of transfer if it is a lifetime transfer). The required period is lengthened to seven years if you own the property but someone else is occupying it.
Whichever period might apply, the property must have been used for agricultural purposes through the duration of that period.
The Livery Case – Personal Representatives for Vigne v HMRC  UKFTT 632 (TC)
This case involved the estate of Maureen Vigne, who had passed away. Her personal representatives, in dealing with her estate, sought to claim IHT reliefs, on the livery business which Maureen used to run. The business consisted of about 30 acres of land, made available to horse-owners for keeping and grazing their horses. Fees were charged and basic services, such as health checks for the horses, were provided.
The personal representatives claimed that the livery constituted relevant business property for the purposes of BPR. Alternatively, they argued that it was agricultural property and entitled to APR. HMRC denied this. They argued that it did not meet the definition of relevant business property on the basis that the business was ‘mainly for investment purposes’.
The judge took a very common-sense approach in determining the issue. Instead of looking for evidence that Maureen’s livery business had not been for investment – as HMRC argued he should do – the judge stated that the question should be approached from a neutral start point. No preconceived ideas should be held, and no assumptions made. The facts should be gathered and then, when all taken together, used to determine whether the business was wholly for investment or not.
In the judge’s view, when looking at the livery business, ‘no properly informed observer could or would have said that [Maureen] was in the business of “holding investments”.’ The judge therefore allowed the BPR to be applied.
Since APR should always be considered before BPR (IHTA 1984, section 114 directs that APR is given priority and BPR may apply to any unrelieved excess), the question of whether the livery would qualify for APR was also addressed.
Here, the judge decided that a livery business would not qualify because equine activities do not generally count as agricultural in the relief provisions. The exception is breeding and rearing horses on a stud farm, but the fact that specific mention is made of this in the relevant law led the judge to conclude that a livery would not be eligible.
Mention was made, however, that the livery’s land contained a hayfield, which could have qualified as agricultural land. However, the judge ruled that this would also not make the land eligible as no crop of hay had been taken from the field in the two years prior to Maureen’s death. As such, it could not be said that Maureen had used the land for an agricultural purpose during the relevant two-year period.
How much tax did the estate save?
The case report does not give us full details on this, but it provides enough information to suggest just how important BPR was for Maureen’s IHT bill.
In the available figures, the livery business and its land were valued at a total of £308,990. This was claimed as being 100% deductible – i.e. that the whole of this sum should not be included in the IHT calculation.
The rest of Maureen’s estate was valued at £595,886, which is enough on its own to use up all of Maureen’s Nil Rate Band for IHT of £325,000. So assuming no other exemptions or reliefs would apply (such as a transferred nil rate band from a spouse, or the residence nil rate band) this would mean that all of the livery’s value (£308,990) would have been taxed at the normal rate for IHT – had the BPR been disallowed.
The normal tax rate for IHT is 40%, so without the BPR, the value of the livery alone would have added £123,596 to the IHT bill on Maureen’s estate. Clearly a saving worth making!
Finding out more
If you think your estate might include businesses, assets, money, or land which might qualify for either of these reliefs, it is important to investigate the matter with a qualified legal professional. This article only skims the surface of the various provisions and exceptions of the reliefs, so it is important to explore them thoroughly when applied to your own circumstances.
To do so, or if you would like to discuss anything else raised in this article, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Roche Legal ©
Roche Legal | rochelegal.co.uk | firstname.lastname@example.org